ВПЛИВ УЛЬТРАЗВУКУ НА ВИРОБНИЦТВО БІОЕТАНОЛУ
Ключові слова:
bioethanol, ultrasonic influence, cavitationАнотація
Theoretical grounds for the prospects of using biofuels are provided. The analysis focuses on the efficiency features of bioethanol production, with particular attention to the impact of ultrasonic irradiation during enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass. It is demonstrated that cavitation flow under high acoustic pressure facilitates the uniform distribution of the investigated medium.
Посилання
J. Timothy, J. Daniel, J. Martin. Production of Bioethanol. A Review of Factors Affecting Ethanol Yield. 2021. Vol 7(4). P. 268.
Balat Mustafa. Production of bioethanol from lignocellulosic materials via the biochemical pathway: A review. 2011. Vol. 52. P. 858-875.
Felipe C. Lunelli, Pâmela Sfalcin, Matheus Souza. Ultrasound-assisted enzymatic hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse for the production of fermentable sugars. Biosystems Engineering. 2014.Vol.124. P. 24-28.
Igor Korobiichuk, Viktorij Mel'nick, Zhanna Ostapenko, Ludmila Ruzhinska. Study of heat and mass transfer processes during extraction of plant raw materials under the influence of ultrasound/ Ultrason Sonochem. 2023 Aug. V.98:106512. doi:10.1016.
Sen Ma, Xiao-li Xue, Shu-juan Yu. High-intensity ultrasound irradiated modification of sugarcane bagasse cellulose in an ionic liquid. Industrial Crops and Products. 2012. Vol. 35. Р. 135-139.
Svetlana Nikolić, Ljiljana Mojović, Marica Rakin. Ultrasound-assisted production of bioethanol by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of corn meal. Food Chemistry. 2010. Food Chemistry. Vol. 122. P. 216-222.
Adriana P. Ramón,Leonardo Taschetto, Felipe Lunelli. Ultrasound-assisted acid and enzymatic hydrolysis of yam (Dioscorea sp.) for the production of fermentable sugars. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology. 2015. Vol. 4. P. 98-102.
Alex Patist, Darren Bates. Ultrasonic innovations in the food industry: From the laboratory to commercial production. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies. 2008. Vol. 9. P. 147-154.
Chisti Y. Sonobioreactors: using ultrasound for enhanced microbial productivity. Trends Biotechnol 2003;21: 89-93.
Gogate PR, Wilhelm AM, Pandit AB. Some aspects of the design of sonochemical reactors. Ultrason Sonochem 2003; 10:325−330.
Suslick KS. The chemical effects of ultrasound. Scientific American 1989; 260:80−86
Gogate PR, Mujumdar S, Pandit AB. Large scale sonochemical reactors for process intensification: design and experimental validation. J Chem Tech Biotechnol 2003; 78:685−693.
Saez V, Frýas-Ferrer A, Iniesta J, Gonzalez-Garcýa J, Aldaz A, Riera E. Characterization of a 20 kHz sonoreactor. Part I: analysis of mechanical effects by classical and numerical methods. Ultrason Sonochem 2005; 12:59−65.
Sulaiman, A. Z.; Ajit, A.; Yunus, R. M.; Cisti, Y. (2011): Ultrasound-assisted fermentation enhances bioethanol productivity. Biochemical Engineering Journal 54/2011. pp. 141–150.
Luft, L., Confortin, T.C., Todero, I. et al. (2019): Ultrasound Technology Applied to Enhance Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Brewer’s Spent Grain and its Potential for Production of Fermentable Sugars. Waste Biomass Valor 10, 2019. 2157–2164.
Karki B, Lamsal BP, Jung S, van Leeuwen J, Pometto III AL, Grewell D, Khanal SK. Enhancing protein and sugar release from defatted soy flakes using ultrasound technology. J Food Eng 2010; 96:270−278.
Gogate PR, Mujumdar S, Pandit AB. Large scale sonochemical reactors for process intensification: design and experimental validation. J Chem Tech Biotechnol 2003; 78:685−693.
Gogate PR, Sutkar VS, Pandit AB. Sonochemical reactors: Important design and scale up considerations with a special emphasis on heterogeneous systems. Chem Eng J 2011; 166:1066−1082.
Chivate MM, Pandit AB. Effect of hydrodynamic and sonic cavitation on aqueous polymeric solutions. Ind Chem Eng 1993; 35:52−58.
