АНАЛІЗ СУЧАСНИХ ТЕХНОЛОГІЙ ВИДАЛЕННЯ ФОСФОРУ З МІСЬКИХ СТІЧНИХ ВОД
Ключові слова:
biotechnology, microorganisms, wastewater, phosphorus removalАнотація
Anthropogenic phosphorus is a major driver of water eutrophication. This study reviews modern approaches to remove phosphorus from urban wastewater and identifies hybrid enhanced biological phosphorus removal combined with chemical polishing is identified as an efficient approach that balances high phosphorus removal efficiency with controlled sludge production.
Посилання
Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste-water treatment. Official Journal L 135, 30.5.1991.
L. Sablii, V. Zhukova, and J. Drewnowski (2024) The Strategies of Nutrient Removal Compounds from Wastewater by Using Higher Aquatic Plants in the Green Deal Implementation, Desalination and Water Treatment, 100954, ISSN 1944-3986 https://authors.elsevier.com/sd/article/S1944-3986(24)20464-1
Larisa Sabliy, Yevgeniy Kuzminskiy, Veronika Zhukova, Marina Kozar and Henryk Sobczuk. New approaches in biological wastewater treatment aimed at removal of organic matter and nutrients / Ecol. Chem. Eng. S., 2019; 26 (2): 331-343. DOL: 10.1515/eces – 2019 – 0023.
Sablii L., Korenchuk M., Kozar M. The influence of nitrate on the phosphate removal from wastewater in activated sludge treatment process / Biotechnologia acta, V. 12, No 4, 2019. P. 50-56. https//doi.org/10.15407/biotech12.04.050
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Nutrient Control Design Manual. EPA/600/R-10/100. Cincinnati, OH: Office of Research and Development; 2010.
Izadi P., Izadi P., Eldyasti A. Design, operation and technology configurations for enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) process: a review. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-020-09538-w
Izadi P., Andalib M. Anaerobic zone functionality, design and configurations for a sustainable EBPR process: A critical review. Sci Total Environ. 2023;862:162018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162018
Rieger L., Gillot S., Langergraber G., Ohtsuki T., Shaw A., Takacs I., Winkler S. Guidelines for Using Activated Sludge Models. IWA Scientific and Technical Report No. 22. London: IWA Publishing; 2012. https://doi.org/10.2166/9781780401164
Brun R., Kühni M., Siegrist H., Gujer W., Reichert P. Practical identifiability of ASM2d parameters: systematic selection and tuning of parameter subsets. Water Res. 2002;36(16):4113–4127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00104-5
Revollar S., Vega P., Francisco M., Martínez Martínez S. Wastewater Treatment Plant Operation: Simple Control Strategies for Plant Wide BSM2 Benchmark. Sustainability. 2020;12(3):768. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030768
Water Environment Federation. Liquid Stream Fundamentals: Tertiary Filtration (Fact Sheet). WEF; 2017.
Henze M., Gujer W., Mino T., Matsuo T., Wentzel M.C., Marais G.v.R., Van Loosdrecht M.C.M. Activated sludge model No. 2d, ASM2D. Water Sci Technol. 1999;39(1):165–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(98)00829-4
Henze M., Gujer W., Mino T., van Loosdrecht M.C.M. (eds.). Activated Sludge Models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3. IWA Scientific and Technical Report No. 9. London: IWA Publishing; 2000. https://doi.org/10.2166/9781780402369
